Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 7 of 7 (0.81 seconds)
Sathy vs Union Of India on 31 January, 2026 cites

Signature Not Verified Digitally ... vs In Item Nos. 151, 211 & 212. Mr Puneet ... on 12 September, 2022

Exhibit P-3 A TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD IS ISSUED TO THE 1ST PETITIONER Exhibit P-4 A TRUE COPY OF THE AADHAR CARD IS ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER Exhibit P-5 A TRUE COPY OF THE 1ST PAGE OF THE SSLC BOOK ISSUED TO THE 2ND PETITIONER Exhibit P-6 A TRUE COPY OF THE JUDGMENT DATED 19.12.2022 IN W.P(C) 24058/2022AND CONNECTED CASES (NANDHINI K VS. UNION OF INDIA 2023 (1) KHC 149) Exhibit P-7 A TRUE COPY OF THE INTERIM ORDER DATED 06.08.2204 IN W.A NO. 696/2024 Exhibit P-8 A TRUE COPY OF THE ANNEXURE A1 PRODUCED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN W. A NO. 696/2024 Exhibit P-9 A TRUE COPY OF THE ANNEXURE A2 PRODUCED BY THE 1ST RESPONDENT IN W.A NO. 696/2024 RESPONDENT EXHIBITS Exhibit R1(a) True copy of the relevant extract of Report No. 129 of the Department related Parliamentary Standing Committee.
Delhi High Court - Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 315 - V Bakhru - Full Document

State Of Orissa & Ors vs Md. Illiyas on 22 November, 2005

In Md. Illiyas (supra), it is held that it is not everything said by a Judge while giving judgment that constitutes a precedent. The only thing in a Judge's decision binding a party is the principle upon which the case is decided and for this reason, it is important to analyse a decision and isolate from it the ratio decidendi. The Division Bench of this Court, while dismissing the delay petition, has not arrived at any ratio and not decided the appeal on merits. However, subsequently, another Division Bench of this Court entertained and allowed the appeal filed by the Union of India. It is true that when the delay petition is dismissed, the consequential dismissal of the appeal will amount to confirmation of the impugned judgment. At the time of hearing the appeal before the subsequent Division Bench, no issue regarding res judicata had been raised by the parties and the Division Bench considered the matter on merits and allowed the appeal. The judgment in WA No.696 of 2024 dated 18.07.2025 is decided on merits considering the factual as well as legal aspects.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 539 - A Pasayat - Full Document
1