Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.21 seconds)The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Section 32A in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 37 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 50 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 57 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Satender Kumar Antil vs Central Bureau Of Investigation on 11 July, 2022
11. Hon'ble the Supreme Court has propounded guidelines on
the subject of bail in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra)
and has held as under:-
Section 389 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja vs State Of Gujarat on 29 October, 2010
9. Likewise, if the Police Officer has information regarding
illegal transportation of any contraband and he is required to take
immediate steps then it is incumbent upon him to write down the
information in writing, send a copy of the same to the superior
officer forthwith and mention all these things in daily rojnaamcha
diary. It is an admitted position that the information was not
relayed to the superior officers and the other requisites were also
(Downloaded on 24/04/2023 at 10:00:20 PM)
[2023/RJJD/011538] (5 of 8) [SOSA-83/2020]
not fullfilled. It is trite law that the provision of Section 42 of the
NDPS Act is required to be applied mandatorily as propounded in
the case of Vijaysinh Chandubha Jadeja (supra). The NDPS
Act is called a draconian law because of its stringent provision of
punishment and that is why the mandatory provisions are required
to be complied with stricto sensu, failure of which vitiates the
recovery.