Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.23 seconds)

Narinder Mohan Arya vs United India Insurance Co.Ltd. & Ors on 5 April, 2006

12. 2 aed 'e be, a eR Ra RR OOP a YSU a Sh. for the applicant and Learned counsel for the respondents were heard and they fi 0 Oa No 200253043 submitted writt @ notes of arguments te summarize the proceedings that took place over a long period of time. The applicant has urged that limitation should be counted from the date of receipt of appellate orders em TL.O5.2002 till filing on 02.01.2003 which is gsgbout 8 months and that the amendment aft re OA to incorporate the appellate order was- also allewed by the Tribunal. They have argued that the appellate order was nor~ epeaking and Ehat the imitial order by the Disciplinary Authority was based 9 a inadequate enquiry process. They rely on the rulings of the Hon'ble Apex Court in Narinder Mohan Arya Vs. United India Insurance Co.Ltd. 5 Ors. reported in AIR-2006-sSc~1748, by which it was held that fairness in the procedure of domestic. enquiry is a part of the principles of natural justice. 'Further, the Hon'ble Apex.
Supreme Court of India Cites 16 - Cited by 369 - S B Sinha - Full Document

Modi Spinning & Weaving Mills Co. Ltd. & ... vs Ladha Ram & Co on 23 September, 1976

And in M/s Modi Spinning & Weaving Millis Co. Ltd. & Anr. V. Ladha Ram & Co., [(1976) 4 SCC 320} has been referred in Usha Balashahesc Swami(supra) and the Hon'ble Apex Court observed that Modi Spinning's case(supra) was CEL et a clear authori ity for the proposition the once a wriLiten atatement contained an admission ain faveur of the plaintiff, by amendment, such an admission of the defendant cannot be withdrawn and if allowed, it would plaintiff.
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 248 - A N Ray - Full Document
1