Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.21 seconds)
Vijay Damji Danger vs State Of Gujarat on 14 October, 2020 cites

Murugan @ Settu vs State Of Tamil Nadu on 6 May, 2011

32. Learned Single Judge did not follow the judicial discipline while taking a contrary and diagonally opposite view to one which have been taken by another learned Single Judge in Settu versus The State (supra). The contrary view taken by learned Single Judge in the impugned judgment is not only erroneous but also sends wrong signals to the State and the prosecution emboldening them to act in breach of liberty of a person."
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 41 - B S Chauhan - Full Document

Pradip Chandra Parija And Ors vs Pramod Chandra Patanaik And Ors on 4 December, 2001

"339. Judicial discipline envisages that a coordinate Page 12 of 17 Downloaded on : Thu Oct 15 01:31:16 IST 2020 C/SCA/9457/2020 CAV ORDER Bench follow the decision of an earlier coordinate Bench. If a coordinate Bench does not agree with the principles of law enunciated by another Bench, the matter may be referred only to a Larger Bench. (See Pradip Chandra Parija v. Pramod Chandra Patnaik, (2002) 1 SCC 1 followed in Union of India Vs. Hansoli Devi, (2002) 7 SCC 273. But no decision can be arrived at contrary to or inconsistent with the law laid down by the coordinate Bench.
Supreme Court of India Cites 4 - Cited by 257 - Full Document

Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. vs Hansoli Devi And Ors. on 12 September, 2002

"339. Judicial discipline envisages that a coordinate Page 12 of 17 Downloaded on : Thu Oct 15 01:31:16 IST 2020 C/SCA/9457/2020 CAV ORDER Bench follow the decision of an earlier coordinate Bench. If a coordinate Bench does not agree with the principles of law enunciated by another Bench, the matter may be referred only to a Larger Bench. (See Pradip Chandra Parija v. Pramod Chandra Patnaik, (2002) 1 SCC 1 followed in Union of India Vs. Hansoli Devi, (2002) 7 SCC 273. But no decision can be arrived at contrary to or inconsistent with the law laid down by the coordinate Bench.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 262 - Full Document

Ram Chand And Ors. vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Ors. on 30 September, 1993

In Ram Chand and Ors. Vs. Union of India and Ors. (1994 (1) SCC 44), it was held by this Court that though no period was prescribed, action within a reasonable time was warranted. The said case related to a dispute which arose before prescription of specific periods. After the quashing of declaration, the same became non-est and was effaced. It is fairly conceded by learned counsel for the respondents that there is no bar on issuing a fresh declaration after following the due procedure. It is, however, contended that in case a fresh notification is Page 15 of 17 Downloaded on : Thu Oct 15 01:31:16 IST 2020 C/SCA/9457/2020 CAV ORDER to be issued, the market value has to be determined on the basis of the fresh Notification under Section 4(1) of the Act and it may be a costly affair for the State. Even if it is so, the interest of the person whose land is sought to be acquired, cannot be lost sight of. He is to be compensated for acquisition of his land. If the acquisition sought to be made is done in an illogical, illegal or irregular manner, he cannot be made to suffer on that count.
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 158 - N P Singh - Full Document

S. Kasi vs State Through The Inspector Of Police ... on 19 June, 2020

5. Ms. Shah would however submit that judicial discipline would demand that the Court follow the oral order dated 26/08/2020 passed in Special Civil Application No. 9203 of 2020 by which the Petition was allowed following the Division Bench decision in Letters Patent Appeal No. 397 of 2018 in Special Civil Application No.3862 of 2018. She would submit that the order in Special Civil Application No. 8809 of 2020 was an interim order and if the Court was inclined to take a view relying on the interim order the matter be referred to the Division Bench, if the Court is of the opinion that the order in Special Civil Application No. 9203 of 2020 dated 26/08/2020 is not a good law. She would rely on the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of S.Kasi versus State through Inspector General Of Police Samavallur Police Station, Madurai District particularly Para 31 and 32 thereof which reads as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 45 - Cited by 164 - A Bhushan - Full Document
1   2 Next