Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 9 of 9 (0.27 seconds)

S.Panneer Selvam vs The Government Of Tamil Nadu on 16 December, 2015

The catch-up rule is not being followed. It is also alleged that promotions of the private respondents are in excess of the quota for SC/ST, i.e., 15% and 7.5% respectively. In sum and substance, the grievance of the applicants is that for grant of accelerated promotion and consequential seniority, respondents No.1 and 2 are required to collect the data, and if it is found that such reserved categories are inadequately represented, they may be granted accelerated promotion and consequential seniority in promotion. Promotion of the private respondents and seniority given to them on promotional posts are said to be violative of the 8 OA-3623/2015 judgments of the Apex Court in M. Nagaraj & others v Union of India [(2006) 8 SCC 212]; Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. v Rajesh Kumar [(2012) 7 SCC 1]; Suraj Bhan Meena v State of Rajastha [(2011) 1 SCC 467]; and S. Panneer Selvam & others v Government of Tamil Nadu [(2015) 10 SCC 292].

U.P.Power Corp.Ltd vs Rajesh Kumar & Ors on 27 April, 2012

6. The issue was further considered by the Apex Court in Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Ltd. v Rajesh Kumar (supra), wherein the question of reservation in promotion with consequential seniority as prescribed under the Uttar Pradesh Public Services 13 OA-3623/2015 (Reservation for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Classes) Act, 1994 was examined.
Supreme Court of India Cites 43 - Cited by 203 - D Misra - Full Document
1