Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.23 seconds)Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 164 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 375 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 90 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 427 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Uday vs State Of Karnataka on 19 February, 2003
16. This Court considered the issue involved herein at length in the case of Uday v. State of Karnataka, AIR 2003 SC 1639; Deelip Singh @ Dilip Kumar v. State of Bihar, AIR 2005 SC 203; Yedla Srinivasa Rao v. State of A.P., (2006) 11 SCC 615; and Pradeep Kumar Verma v. State of Bihar & Anr., AIR 2007 SC 3059, and came to the conclusion that in the event that the accuseds promise is not false and has not been made with the sole intention to seduce the prosecutrix to indulge in sexual acts, such an act(s) would not amount to rape. Thus, the same would only hold that where the prosecutrix, under a misconception of fact to the extent that the accused is likely to marry her, submits to the lust of the accused, such a fraudulent act cannot be said to be consensual, so far as the offence of the accused is concerned.