Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.15 seconds)

P.S. Devgun vs P. Walia on 12 February, 1975

(13) I accept that a landlord is bound to give a satisfactory explanation for not occupying any other premises belonging to him that have fallen vacant shortly before a petition for recovery of possession is filed or whilst it is pending : see P.S. Devgun v. S.P. Walia 1975 Rlr Note 71 page 63 : Satya Pal v. Smt. Parsani Devi, 1974 Rcr 508. This really follows from the requirement of section 14(1)(e) that the land lord has 'no other reasonably suitably residential accommodation'. But, the other accommodation must be 'reasonably suitable'.
Delhi High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1