Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 22 (0.44 seconds)The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 100 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 7 in The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Section 4 in The Essential Commodities Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Datu Ram vs State on 25 January, 1996
In the case of Datu Ram Vs. State (1996)1 AD (Delhi) 52, it has been
held that all the links starting from the seizure of sample till the same reaches
the hands of public analyst must be proved to conclude that the seals remained
intact.
Dhanpat vs Punjab State Through Collector And Ors. on 30 August, 1996
In the case of Dhanpat Vs. State of Punjab 2000 (1) CC Cases HC 52,
it has been held that in the absence of any link evidence that the property was
deposited in the malkhana intact, accused is entitled to benefit of doubt.
Matloob vs State (Delhi Administration) on 23 April, 1997
In Matloob vs. State (Delhi Administration), 1997 IV AD
(Delhi) 178, it has been observed by the Hon'ble Delhi High Court that delay
and latches in despatching samples to CFSL is fatal for prosecution.
Sadhu Singh Roda S/O Buta Singh Etc vs State Of Punjab on 25 January, 1984
I have relied upon Sadhu Singh versus State of Punjab, (1997) 3
Crimes 55 (PH) wherein it is held that:
Hem Raj & Ors vs State Of Haryana on 29 March, 2005
In the case of Hem Raj v. State of Haryana AIR 2005 SC 2110, it has
been observed that: