Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 6 of 6 (0.21 seconds)

Ramesh Kumar Soni vs State Of Madhya Pradesh on 26 February, 2013

Having considered the contention of learned counsel for the applicant and on perusal of the record, in view of this Court this petition has no merit as Hon’ble Apex Court in the case of Ramesh Kumar Soni (supra) has held that the provision of amended Act of Madhya Pradesh The Code of Criminal Procedure (Madhya Pradesh Amendment) Act of 2007 would also be applicable in pending cases and set aside Full Bench Judgment of this Court passed In 2 MCRC-16630-2019 reference: Amendment of First Schedule of Criminal Procedure Code by Criminal Procedure Code (M.P. Amendment) Act, 2007, (2008) 3 MPLJ 311]. In para 14 the Hon’ble Apex Court has observed that the questions formulated by the Full Bench of the High Court were answered in negative, holding that all cases pending in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class as on 22nd February, 2008 when the amendment to the First Schedule to CrPC became operative, will remain unaffected by the said amendment and such matters as were, in the meanwhile committed to the Court of Session, will be sent back to the Judicial Magistrate, First Class for trial in accordance with law.
Supreme Court of India Cites 55 - Cited by 497 - T S Thakur - Full Document

Rajesh Kumar Dubey vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh on 25 July, 2017

So far another judgment of Single Bench of this Court passed in the case of Rakesh Kumar Dubey (supra) is concerned in the judgment the aforesaid law laid down by the Honble Apex Court has not been dealt with, however the reference of the judgment has been made on different point. Therefore, the aforesaid judgment has not laid down correct preposition of the law. It is settled law that when the binding precedent of the Hon’ble Apex Court is ignored by the Bench of the similar strength that judgment can be ignored being per incuriam.
Madhya Pradesh High Court Cites 6 - Cited by 60 - Full Document
1