Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 9 of 9 (0.39 seconds)Section 5 in The Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Section 45A in The Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
The Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963
Section 45 in The Kerala General Sales Tax Act, 1963 [Entire Act]
Ismail Ajmeri vs State Of Kerala on 24 February, 2007
11. Coming to the submission made by the learned counsel for
the petitioner with reference to the observations made by a Single
Judge of this Court in the concluding paragraph of the decision reported
in Ismail Vs, State of Kerala (2005 (3) KLT 1052) , it is true that , it
has been observed under the heand 'conclusions' as follows:
Chairman, Indore Vikas Pradhikaran vs M/S Pure Industrial Cock & Chem. Ltd. & ... on 15 May, 2007
The learned Government
Pleader further submits that, the idea and understanding of the
petitioner as to the scope of the proceedings under Sub Sections 3 and
5 of the Section 45A are quite wrong and misconceived and that
'purposive interpretation' has to be made, to give effect to the statutory
prescription, more so in view of the law declared by the Apex Court in
Dilip S. Dahankur Vs. Kotak Mahindra Co. Ltd. [(2007) 6 SCC 528)
(Paragraph 54) and also in Chairman, Indore Vikas Pradhikaran
VS. Pure Industrial Coke and Chemical Ltd. [(2007) 8 SCC 705)
(Paragraph 88 onwards).
Dilip S. Dahanukar vs Kotak Mahindra Co. Ltd. & Anr on 10 April, 2007
The learned Government
Pleader further submits that, the idea and understanding of the
petitioner as to the scope of the proceedings under Sub Sections 3 and
5 of the Section 45A are quite wrong and misconceived and that
'purposive interpretation' has to be made, to give effect to the statutory
prescription, more so in view of the law declared by the Apex Court in
Dilip S. Dahankur Vs. Kotak Mahindra Co. Ltd. [(2007) 6 SCC 528)
(Paragraph 54) and also in Chairman, Indore Vikas Pradhikaran
VS. Pure Industrial Coke and Chemical Ltd. [(2007) 8 SCC 705)
(Paragraph 88 onwards).
Chackolas Spinning And Weaving Mills ... vs State Of Kerala on 17 January, 2006
7. The learned Government Pleader submits that, the validity of
the above notification has already been upheld by a learned Single
Judge of this Court in A.P.Ismail (Anwar Traders) Vs, State of Kerala
(2005 (3) KLT 1052) and by a Division Bench of this Court in
W.P. (C) Nos. 30292 of 2010
and 5930 of 2008
: 6 :
Chackolas Spinning & Weaving Mill Ltd. Vs. State of Kerala (2006
(1) KLT 989), though further challenge has been raised by the
aggrieved party before the Apex Court, where the SLP preferred has
been admitted and the same is pending.
1