Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.21 seconds)Hitesh Verma vs The State Of Uttarakhand on 5 November, 2020
13. As far as the judgment relied upon by the learned Senior
9/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
CRL.O.P.No.20070 of 2020
Counsel appearing for the petitioner in the case of Hitesh Verma vs. The
State of Uttarakhand and another [Criminal Appeal No.707 of 2020], is
concerned, in paragraph Nos.10 and 18, the Hon'ble Supreme Court has
held as follows:
The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Section 3 in The Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 [Entire Act]
State Of Haryana And Ors vs Ch. Bhajan Lal And Ors on 21 November, 1990
8. The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of State of Haryana and
others vs. Bhajan Lal and others [1992 Supp (1) SCC 335], has held as
follows:-
Section 309 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Vinod Kumar vs State Of Punjab on 23 September, 2014
14. The facts in the present case is totally different from the above
cases. Herein, remarks have been made in public view and not only against
the persons holding high posts but also some other retired Judges stating
that they have become judges only at the alms rendered by the Dravidian
Progressive Federation, which prima facie insult and humiliate such people.
Therefore, this Court is of the view that it is not a fit case to exercise the
10/12
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis/
CRL.O.P.No.20070 of 2020
power under Section 482 Cr.P.C., to quash the proceedings. Accordingly,
this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. The trial Court shall strictly
follow the provisions under Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure
and the guidelines given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Vinod Kumar
vs. State of Punjab [2015 (1) MLJ (crl) 288] and complete the trial on day-
to-day basis expeditiously without any further delay. Consequently,
connected miscellaneous petitions are closed.
1