Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Ltd vs Emco Ltd. & Ors on 2 February, 2016
In another ruling reported as Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v.
EMCO Limited &Anr. (2016) 11 SCC 182.The Supreme Court has held
thus:
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.24 seconds)Section 86 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
The General Clauses Act, 1897
The Income Tax Act, 1961
Section 14 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Section 21 in The General Clauses Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 62 in The Electricity Act, 2003 [Entire Act]
Section 2 in The Companies Act, 1956 [Entire Act]
Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited vs Tarini Infrastructure Ltd.& Ors on 5 July, 2016
11. As was explained subsequently by Hon'ble Supreme Court in its
decision reported as Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited v. Solar
Semiconductor Power Company (India) Limited, (2017) 16 SCC 498, the
case of Tarini Infrastructure (supra) involved the question as to whether
tariff fixed under the PPA was sacrosanct and inviolable, beyond the
review and correction by the regulatory commission. The power producer
in that case had sought revision of tariff by the Commission primarily on
the ground of longer distance to which the power was to be evacuated
than the one envisaged in the concession agreement. In that context,
the Court had ruled to regulate the prices of sale and purchase of
electricity and to "re-determine the tariff rate".