Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.23 seconds)
Brakes India Ltd. vs Cc on 10 July, 1998 cites

M/S. Oblum Electrical Industries Pvt. ... vs Collector Of Customs Bombay on 2 September, 1997

13. The Tribunal's order in the case of Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, Bombay (final order No. 284/95-C dated 29.9.1995) and majority opinion in the case of ITC Ltd. v. CCE, Bombay have naturally followed the Pankaj Jain case. This however, does not affect the above situation because Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Haryana Plywood Industries had not been delivered by then.
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 42 - S C Agrawal - Full Document

I.T.C. Limited vs Collector Of Central Excise, Bombay on 26 August, 1996

13. The Tribunal's order in the case of Reliance Industries Ltd. v. Collector of Customs, Bombay (final order No. 284/95-C dated 29.9.1995) and majority opinion in the case of ITC Ltd. v. CCE, Bombay have naturally followed the Pankaj Jain case. This however, does not affect the above situation because Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment in the case of Haryana Plywood Industries had not been delivered by then.
Supreme Court of India Cites 1 - Cited by 8 - J S Verma - Full Document

C.C.E vs I.T.C. Limited on 17 February, 1994

I find that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CCE v. New Tobacco Co. (supra) after considering the earlier decision in the case of Pankaj Jain Agencies v. UOI held that when the Notification is published in the official gazette, then mere printing of it in the gazette is not enough unless the gazette containing the notification is made available to the public, the notification cannot be said to have been duly published. The Hon'ble Supreme Court para 12 has held as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 47 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Haryana Plywood Industries vs Collector Of Customs on 22 August, 1994

Whether in view of the Hon'ble Supreme Court judgment in the case of Pankaj Jain Agencies (supra), the appeal was required to be rejected as proposed by Hon'ble Member (Judicial) or in view of Hon'ble Supreme Court's judgment dismissing the appeal against the Tribunal's order in the case of Haryana Plywood Industries (supra), the matter is required to be remanded for de novo consideration in the light of observations and findings of the Vice-President.
Calcutta High Court Cites 9 - Cited by 3 - T Chatterjee - Full Document
1