Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 1 of 1 (0.46 seconds)

Ramala Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd, Up vs Commr.Of Central Excise-I,Meerut on 29 November, 2010

'Whether the shoes worn by the workers necessary for manufacturing activity will fall within the definition of capital goods and amount to an input under Rule 2(a) and Rule 2(k) of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004.' The interpretation of the word 'input' has already been referred to a larger Bench in (2010) 14 SCC 744 (Ramala Sahkari Chini Mills Ltd. v. CCE).
Supreme Court of India Cites 18 - Cited by 100 - D K Jain - Full Document
1