Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.26 seconds)Section 125 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955
Section 13 in The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [Entire Act]
Badshah vs Sou. Urmila Badshah Godse & Anr on 18 October, 2013
The counsel also relied on the
judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in Palla Shanthi
Kiran v. The State of AP and Others [MANU/AP/0193/2020],
the judgment in Badshah v. Urmila Badshah Godse and
Others [AIR 2014 SC 869] and also the judgment in Amina v.
T.K. Surendran vs P. Najima Bindu on 24 July, 2014
The counsel submitted that the Family court denied
maintenance from that date onwards because in OP
No.671/2014, a decree is passed nullifying the marriage. That
is not a reason to deny the maintenance to the petitioner is the
2025:KER:61255
RPFC NO. 282 OF 2017
3
contention. The counsel for the petitioner relied on the
judgment of this Court in Surendran T.K. v. P.Najima Bindu
and Another [2012 (2) ILR 28]. The counsel for the
respondent submitted that there is nothing to interfere with the
impugned order. It is submitted that the Family Court already
declared the marriage as a nullity. Therefore the petitioner is
not entitled maintenance from the date on which the marriage
is annulled by the Family Court.
1