Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.86 seconds)Section 6 in The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 [Entire Act]
Sunil Mahadev Patil vs The State Of Maharashtra on 3 August, 2015
Adopting the same principles as was held
in the said case of Sunil Mahadev Patil (supra), this Court sees no reason
8
why pre-arrest bail cannot be granted to the petitioner taking into
consideration his antecedents and the fact that he had cooperated with the
investigation.
Puttaraja @ Putta vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 July, 2012
iv) Unreported case
Karnataka High Court
Puttappa @ Putta v. State of Karnataka, paragraphs 3 & 5.
Independent Thought vs Union Of India on 11 October, 2017
31. It may be noted that the case cited by the learned P.P, that is,
Independent Thought (supra) deals with the specific provision of exception
2 to section 375 IPC which prescribes that sexual intercourse or sexual acts
by a man with his own wife, the wife not being under fifteen years of age, is
not rape and after a detailed discussion, the Apex Court has read down the
provision to read as " Sexual intercourse or sexual acts by a man with his
own wife, the wife not being under eighteen years of age, is not rape". This
in the opinion of this Court has no relevance to the facts and circumstances
of the case, the marriage of the Petitioner and the alleged victim not having
been proved.