Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.35 seconds)
Jitendrakumar Kashiram Patel vs State Of Gujarat on 20 August, 2025 cites

Zahoor Ahmad Rather vs Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad on 5 December, 2018

"13. This Court in the case of Zahoor Ahmad Rather and Others v. Sheikh Imtiyaz Ahmad and Others, (2019) 2 SCC 404 held that judicial review can neither expand the ambit of the prescribed qualifications nor decide the Page 22 of 24 Uploaded by M.H. DAVE(HC00193) on Wed Aug 20 2025 Downloaded on : Wed Aug 20 23:58:31 IST 2025 NEUTRAL CITATION C/SCA/1283/2010 JUDGMENT DATED: 20/08/2025 undefined equivalence of the prescribed qualifications with any other given qualification. Therefore, the equivalence of a qualification is not a matter that can be determined in the exercise of the power of judicial review. Whether a particular qualification should or should not be regarded as equivalent is a matter for the State, as the recruiting authority, to determine. (emphasis supplied) "
Supreme Court of India Cites 6 - Cited by 320 - U U Lalit - Full Document

Anand Yadav vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 12 October, 2020

"18. In circumstances where the appointing authority has not objected to the qualifications of the appellants and there is no apparent or glaring difference in the qualifications, we see no reason for courts to interfere and set-aside the appointments made after due consideration. It is the appointing authority which has to take the decision on whether the candidate possesses what is required by the post in cases of disputed equivalence. This Court has stated the same in categorical terms in its decision Anand Yadav v. State of U.P., (2021) 12 SCC 390. :
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 36 - S K Kaul - Full Document
1   2 Next