Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (1.99 seconds)Section 10A in The Dentists Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
The Dentists Act, 1948
Unnikrishnan P.J. And Ors. vs State Of A.P. And Ors. on 14 May, 1993
The situation as on today is that in the State of
maharashtra, not only the common entrance test has been held
and result published but the students have also been
allotted against all the free seats. But for the
clarification sought by the State Government with respect to
N.R.I. quota, the allotment of payment seats would also have
been completed by now. In Karnataka, common entrance test
has been held confining it to Karnataka students alone and
results have been published but no allotment has been made
awaiting the orders of this Court. (Sri Rama jois, learned
counsel appearing for certain non-karnataka students
complains that State Government is in truth colluding with
the managements of professional colleges with a view to
defeat the scheme framed by this Court and that while
amending Rules on one hand restricting the admissions to
karnataka students, the Government has permitted the
managements to issue advertisements inviting applications
for admission to these colleges to be submitted directly to
them. Even the amendment of Rules in 1995 (referred to
above), says Sri Jois, is in truth intended to allow these
colleges to admit students to their choice directly since it
is a well known fact that all the payment seats cannot be
filled by Karnataka students.) So far as other States are
concerned, precise information is not placed before us
except to state that the process of admission is at various
stages of finalisation.
Miss Mohini Jain vs State Of Karnataka And Ors on 30 July, 1992
None before us, it may be noted, asked
for a return to the situation obtaining prior to Mohini Jain
v. State of Karnataka (1992 (3) S.C.C.666) and Unnikrishnan.
Section 12 in The Dentists Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 20 in The Dentists Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
Section 3 in The Dentists Act, 1948 [Entire Act]
1