Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (0.26 seconds)

Govt. Of Nct Of Delhi And Ors. vs K.R. Jain And Ors. on 30 March, 2006

11. DPCL has pleaded that it is only a Holding Company of GNCTD and is not the successor of the liabilities on account of the distribution business of the erstwhile DVB; that the liability to contest consumer claims and to bear the liability is that of the distribution company which in this case is BRPL; reliance in this regard is placed on Government of National Capital W.P.(C) No.2192/2010 Page 8 of 19 Territory of Delhi Vs. K.R. Jain 2006 (88) DRJ 439; DERC in its order dated 30th January, 2009 supra has rightly held that DPCL is not within the jurisdiction of DERC.

Bishun Chand vs Girdhari Lal on 14 May, 1934

Reliance in this regard is placed on Gordon Woodroffe and Company (Madras) Ltd. Vs. Shaik M.A. Majid and Company AIR 1967 SC 181, order dated 23rd March, 2010 in WP(C) No. 7225/2007 titled New Variety Tent House Vs. GNCTD and Bishun Chand Vs. Girdhari Lal Vol. LVI, ILR Privy Council 376. It is alternatively argued that the Limitation Act does not have any application to writ proceedings and it is only to be seen whether there is a reasonable explanation for the alleged delay and laches.
Bombay High Court Cites 12 - Cited by 21 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next