Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 2 of 2 (0.68 seconds)Ambati Narasayya vs M. Subba Rao & Anr on 6 October, 1989
2. The petitioner had submitted Ext.P-7 representation
dated 4.12.2007 in compliance with Ext.P-6 judgment. In Ext.P-7,
the petitioner has specifically brought to the notice of the 2nd
respondent-Tahsildar that the aforesaid mortgaged property
coming to an extent of 20.20 ares (about 50 cents) would fetch
atleast Rs.40,000/- per cent and that the residential building
situated in the said land would fetch atleast Rs.10 Lakhs.
Accordingly, the petitioner contended in Ext.P-7 that there is no
necessity to sell the second plot of land having an extent of 20.40
ares and it was specifically contended that in view of the legal
principles laid down by the Apex court in the case Ambati
Narasayya v. M.Subba Rao and another reported in AIR 1990 SC 119,
::5::
1