Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 6 of 6 (0.20 seconds)Article 16 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Chander Mohan Negi vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 17 April, 2020
(viii) Pawan Kumar Vs Union of India, 2026 INSC 156-
The Tribunal dismissed the prayer for regularization of causal
employees by applying the decision of the Uma Devi (supra), which
was upheld by the Hon'ble High court and in challenge, the Hon'ble
Apex court held that the Tribunal was not justified in denying relief to
the applicants therein by relying upon the decision in Umadevi (3)
and Ors. (supra) and the Hon'ble High Court also erred in affirming
the decision of the Tribunal by observing that the laudable intent of
the judgment is being subverted when institutions rely on its dicta to
indiscriminately reject the claims of employees, even in cases where
their appointments are not illegal, but merely lack adherence to
procedural formalities.
Shripal vs Nagar Nigam, Ghaziabad on 12 September, 2023
6. On examination of the fact of the matter with reference to the
decisions cited above, we find the letter dated 16.01.2025 deserves
Digitally signed by Kalpeswar Behera
Kalpeswar DN: cn=Kalpeswar Behera,
o=Central Administrative Tribunal
Cuttack Bench, ou=ALL,
Behera [email protected]
Date: 2026.05.22 12:12:39 +05'30'
16 O.A.260/00040of 2025
to be quashed because despite the said letter the applicant has been
allowed to continue to discharge the duty on casual basis on payment
of 1/30th minimum pay scale as per rules and therefore, the said
letter dated 16.01.2025 is accordingly quashed. Since the applicant
has been continuing for more than one and half decades,
respondents are directed to consider the case of the applicant for
regularization keeping in mind the decision of the Hon'ble Apex
Court, in the cases of Jaggo (supra), Shripal & Another (supra),
Dharam Singh & Ors (supra), Chander Mohan Negi and others
(supra), H Vinod Kumar & Ors. (supra), Pawan Kumar (supra), and
Prem Chand & Ors (supra) within a period of 180 days from the date
of receipt of a copy of this order.
Dharam Dev And Others vs State Of U.P. & Another on 10 August, 2010
6. On examination of the fact of the matter with reference to the
decisions cited above, we find the letter dated 16.01.2025 deserves
Digitally signed by Kalpeswar Behera
Kalpeswar DN: cn=Kalpeswar Behera,
o=Central Administrative Tribunal
Cuttack Bench, ou=ALL,
Behera [email protected]
Date: 2026.05.22 12:12:39 +05'30'
16 O.A.260/00040of 2025
to be quashed because despite the said letter the applicant has been
allowed to continue to discharge the duty on casual basis on payment
of 1/30th minimum pay scale as per rules and therefore, the said
letter dated 16.01.2025 is accordingly quashed. Since the applicant
has been continuing for more than one and half decades,
respondents are directed to consider the case of the applicant for
regularization keeping in mind the decision of the Hon'ble Apex
Court, in the cases of Jaggo (supra), Shripal & Another (supra),
Dharam Singh & Ors (supra), Chander Mohan Negi and others
(supra), H Vinod Kumar & Ors. (supra), Pawan Kumar (supra), and
Prem Chand & Ors (supra) within a period of 180 days from the date
of receipt of a copy of this order.
1