Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.16 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
Yerukola Alias Penta Jogulu (Dead) And ... vs Yerukola Alias Penta Tatayya Alias ... on 12 January, 1922
See Yerukola v. Yerukola (AIR 1922 Mad 150) The Court further observed that the right to profits against a co-sharer in possession, is not a right in law to mesne profits, but is a right to obtain and call for an account, and such a right can be transferred.
Babburu Basavayya And Ors. vs Babburu Guravayya And Anr. on 2 February, 1951
The Division Bench followed the dictum laid down in the Babburu Basavayya's case (supra) and held that even in the absence of any provision to award future mesne profits in favour of a party in the preliminary decree, it is open to Court even after the preliminary decree to make a division of the profits that have accrued from such properties pending the suit as such profits really form part of the corpus available for division.
Susai Lazar Villavaraya vs M. Ramaswami Naidu And Ors. on 20 April, 1933
In support of his contention, learned counsel invited my attention to a ruling of the Madras High Court in Sassi Lazar Villavaraya v. M. Ramaswami Naidu (AIR 1933 Mad 710). In that case the Madras High Court held that it is well settled that the receipt of profits by a co-sharer is not wrongful.
1