Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.21 seconds)
Ms. Neeru Relia vs Mr. Subhash @ Bablu on 2 November, 2018 cites

Chetan Malhotra vs Lala Ram on 13 May, 2016

The High Court of Delhi in Chetan Malhotra's case (Supra) mandated to apply multiplier of 15 for children (victims) more than 10 years of age not having attained age of majority. Victim being about 15 years of of age, a multiplier of 15 is taken. Counting in this way, loss of estate comes to Rs. P 8,13,906.75 (15000x1125/331x15). After deducting 1/3rd, the pecuniary loss to estate comes to Rs. 5,42,604.50p. An equal amount is added to it for composite non-pecuniary damages including future prospects, making a total sum of Rs. 10,85,209p.
Delhi High Court Cites 39 - Cited by 249 - R K Gauba - Full Document

R.K. Malik & Anr vs Kiran Pal & Ors on 15 May, 2009

when victim died. CII for the financial year 2016-2017 is Rs. 1125/-. The Apex Court in case of R. K. Malik Vs. Kiran Pal (2009) 14 SCC (1) devided child victims in three categories, the first being those, who were less than ten years of age. Second category being of children more than 10 years and upto 15 years, and in third category there are children more than 15 years of age but not having attained age of majority.
Supreme Court of India Cites 17 - Cited by 973 - M Sharma - Full Document
1   2 Next