Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.20 seconds)
Shri Nilkanth Narhar Sakhawalkar vs Shri Suresh Lahoti on 9 January, 2009 cites

Amar Nath Agarwalla vs Dhillon Transport Agency on 28 February, 2007

In this background the reliance of the Petitioners' ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 14:13:15 ::: ( 6 ) counsel on Amar Nath Agarwalla Vs. Dhillon Transport Agency (2007) 4 SCC 306, 306 is of no assistance, as in that case there was existing partnership which was changed and new partners were inducted with original tenant who continued in legal possession of the premises as a partner of newly formed firm.
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 18 - Full Document

M/S Mahendra Saree Emporium vs G.V. Srinivasa Murthy on 27 August, 2004

In this background, the decisions of the Apex Court ::: Downloaded on - 09/06/2013 14:13:15 ::: ( 7 ) in Mahendra Saree Emporium (II) Vs. G.V.Srinivasa Murthy (2005) 1 SCC 481 and Parvinder Singh Vs. Renu Gautam and Ors. (2004) 4 SCC 794, 794 are of no assistance to support his case to interfere with the findings so arrived at by the Courts below ordering the decree of possession against the Petitioners on the ground of sub-tenancy.
Supreme Court of India Cites 33 - Cited by 71 - R C Lahoti - Full Document

Parvinder Singh vs Renu Gautam & Ors on 22 April, 2004

9. In the present case, in my view also as the tenant was not actually associated with the partnership business tenancy and premises ig not retained the use and control with him and practically parted of the with the possession of the suit premises and indirectly collecting the amount for the sub-tenancy by entering into such partnership deed and agreement to conceal the real intention of sub-tenancy. Such nature of transaction in the present facts and circumstances of the case, and as observed by both the Courts, supports the case of landlord Respondent even as per Parvindar Singh (Supra).
Supreme Court of India Cites 10 - Cited by 86 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1