Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.26 seconds)Jagdish Lal & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 7 May, 1997
In this respect cases relied
upon by learned counsel for the revisionists are fully applicable and particularly in
para 9 and 10 of the judgment of Hon'ble High Court of Delhi in the case Jagdish
Vs. State 2010 (4) JCC 2784 clearly lays down that in a warrant trial case
instituted otherwise than on a police report, an opportunity has to be granted to
the prosecution / complainant to lead pre charge evidence u/s 244 Cr.PC by
giving an opportunity to the accused persons to cross examine the witnesses of
complainant examined during pre-charge evidence and accused persons cannot
be deprived of this legal right to cross examine such witnesses of complainant
and in the absence of such an opportunity, accused persons are certainly
prejudiced.
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 323 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 380 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 245 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Ravi Shankar Mishra & Anr vs State Of Bihar & Anr on 10 December, 2010
5. Learned counsel for respondent no. 2, on the other hand, placed
reliance on the cases reported as Brahmeshwar Rai Vs. State 1984 CLJ 1676;
Ravi Shankar Mishra Vs. State 1991 CLJ 213; Manjit Kaur Vs. State 27
(1985) DLT 31.