Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 12 (0.30 seconds)Sarla Verma & Ors vs Delhi Transport Corp.& Anr on 15 April, 2009
20. We are constrained to hold that after the decisions on Sarla Verma (Supra) and Pranay Sethi (Supra), the learned Tribunal was under an obligation to follow the said dicta and not the IInd Schedule of the Act, 1988 if the claim petition filed under Section 166 of the Act, 1988. Hence, we are hasten to hold that multiplier of 18 would be just multiplier.
The Motor Vehicles Act, 1988
National Insurance Company Ltd vs Pranay Sethi Son Of Late Prashant Sethi ... on 20 April, 2011
The amount of compensation to be awarded as consortium will be governed by the principles of awarding compensation under 'Loss of Consortium' as laid down in Prany Sethi (Supra).
Kirti vs Oriental Insurance Company Limited on 5 January, 2021
In recent judgment titled Kirti Vs. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., 2021 (1) TAC (1) S.C., principle of assessment even for home maker has been narrated.
United India Insurance Company Limited vs Asha Dhamecha 9 Mac/1038/2014 Biresh ... on 4 December, 2019
5. The owner and the Insurance Company have accepted the findings as far as their liability is concerned. The Tribunal even held that strict trappings of criminal and civil proceedings could not be made applicable to the proceedings under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 and relied on the decisions in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. U.C. Thakur and others, 2006 ACJ 2759 and National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mahfuja Begum and others, 2002 ACJ 214. There is no dispute as far as the said issue is concerned.
United India Insurance Co. Ltd. vs Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur And Ors. on 30 June, 2020
In that view of the matter, we have placed reliance on the decision in United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Satinder Kaur @ Satwinder Kaur, 2020 (0) AIJEL-SC 66336.
Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd vs Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram on 18 September, 2018
24. The parents have lost their son at a very young age, the Tribunal has awarded meagre amount under the head of filial consortium. The Apex Court while awarding filial consortium in Magma General Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Nanu Ram Alias Chuhru Ram & Ors (2018) 18 SCC 130 has held as under:
National Insurance Company Ltd. vs Mannat Johal on 23 April, 2019
27. This takes us to the vexed question of grant of interest. The repo rate is declining day in day out. The Rule 220 (6) of Uttar Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules (11th Amendment), 2011 prescribes 7% rate of interest. We cannot grant interest less than 7% and, therefore, in view of the decision of the Apex Court in National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mannat Johal and Others, 2019 (2) T.A.C. 705 (S.C.), we consider it just and proper to award 7.5% rate of interest. The interest has to be from the date of filing of the claim petition and we confirm the same.
Anita Sharma vs The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. on 8 December, 2020
We can even fall back on the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Anita Sharma and Others Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd. and another, (2021) 1 SCC 171.