Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.38 seconds)
Susheelamma vs T Lakshman Reddy on 4 April, 2025 cites

Union Of India & Ors vs Vasavi Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd. & Ors on 7 January, 2014

54. Another judgment (2014) 2 SCC 269 in the case of Union Of India & Ors vs Vasavi Co-Op. Housing Society Ltd. 71 RFA NO.569/2015 C/W RFA NO.947/2015 RFA NO.622/2015 wherein it is held that the revenue records will not confer the right to title over the property. There is no dispute in respect of the principle held by the Hon'ble Supreme Court. Herein this case the property has been granted to the father of the plaintiff and subsequently the same was partitioned by the petitioner and his brother and continued to be in possession. Therefore, the question of stating the plaintiff is not the owner of property does not arises. On the other hand the defendant also purchased the property from a grantee Muniyappa under the sale deed in respect of Sy.No.110 but not in Sy.No.112/1 and 112/2, both the properties are altogether different. The boundaries are also different from each other , even on perusal of the plaint schedule and the schedule given by the defendant are altogether different properties.
Supreme Court of India Cites 11 - Cited by 229 - K Radhakrishnan - Full Document

Sant Lal (Dead) Thr. His L.R Vinod Kumar vs Sadhu Ram (Dead) Thr. His Lrs. . on 26 October, 2015

52. Learned counsel for both parties relied upon various judgments in their favour, in respect of 2024 5 SCC 282 in the case of Vasantha (Dead) Thr. L.R. vs Rajalakshmi @ Rajam (Dead) Thr. Lrs. wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has held seeking declaration relief without seeking recovery of possession the suit is not maintainable. The principle laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court will not applicable to the case on hand as the plaintiff is able to show he is in possession and enjoyment of schedule property as on the date of filing the suit.
Supreme Court - Daily Orders Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1