Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 18 (0.35 seconds)

Shambhu Kharwar vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 12 August, 2022

23. The learned counsel for the petitioner next relying on the case of Shambhu Kharwar Vs. The State of U.P. & Anr. (supra) submits that where two consenting Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71748 of 2023(2) dt.18-10-2023 14/17 adults enter into a consensual relationship, no offence under Section 376 IPC is made out as the crucial ingredients of rape as defined under Section 375 IPC are absent.
Supreme Court of India Cites 19 - Cited by 112 - D Y Chandrachud - Full Document

Maheshwar Tigga vs The State Of Jharkhand on 28 September, 2020

22. The learned counsel for the petitioner next relying on the case of Maheshwar Tigga Vs. The State of Jharkhand (supra) submits that- that misconception of fact has to be in proximity of time to the occurrence and cannot be spread over the period of 12 years, further relying on the case of Pramod Suryabhan Pawar Vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr. (supra), it is submitted that the O.P. No. 6 alleges that promise to marry was made in 2011, as such, it cannot be said that the promise so made was false in 2023.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 241 - N Sinha - Full Document

Salib @ Shalu @ Salim vs The State Of Uttar Pradesh on 8 August, 2023

24. The learned counsel for the petitioner lastly submits relying on the case of Salib @ Shalu @ Salim Vs. State of U.P. & Ors. (supra) that when the Court is exercising its inherent jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. which is to be used sparingly, but then while dealing with the case, it is not enough for the Court just to look into the averments made in the F.I.R./Complaint alone for the purposes of ascertaining whether the necessary ingredients to constitute the alleged offences are disclosed or not, it is next submitted that the Court must be circumspect while Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71748 of 2023(2) dt.18-10-2023 15/17 dealing with frivolous or vexatious proceedings by looking into many other attending circumstances emerging from the record of the case over and above the averments and if need be, with the due care and circumspection tried to read in between the lines, further the Court while exercising its jurisdiction under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. or Article 226 of the Constitution of India need not restrict itself only to the stage of a case but is empowered to take into account the overall circumstances leading to the registration of the case as well as the materials collected in the course of investigation.
Supreme Court of India Cites 34 - Cited by 17 - B R Gavai - Full Document
1   2 Next