Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 10 (0.94 seconds)The Passports Act, 1967
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
A.N. Jegannathan (Deceased), ... vs The Union Of India (Uoi), Represented By ... on 3 June, 2002
therefore, the apprehension shown by the learned trial court is not correct and is without any basis. The trial is not commenced and therefore, in near future, the said trial will not be concluded and in view of the decision rendered by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Menaka Gandhi vs. Union of India, reported in AIR 1978 SC 597, the citizen is having fundamental right to go abroad on certain conditions. Therefore, in view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the opinion that the order dated 25.3.2013 passed by learned 7th Additional Sessions Judge, Vadodara below application Exh.1 in Criminal Misc. Application No.485 of 2013 in Special Case No.6 of 2004, is required to be quashed and set aside and therefore the same is quashed and set aside. The petition is allowed. The learned trial court is directed to return the passport to the petitioner ....
Tamil Nadu Private Colleges (Regulation) Act, 1976
Article 13 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Priya Parameshwaran Pillai vs Union Of India And Ors. on 12 March, 2015
22. It is also useful to take note of the judgment of the Delhi High Court in Priya Parameshwaran Pillai vs. Union of India and ors., dated 12 March 2015, reported in CDJ 2015 DHC 399, wherein the Delhi High Court has held that the action of the Government of India in not allowing the petitioner therein, a Green Peace Activist, from travelling abroad, on the ground that she is likely to speak against the country's economic policies and how it affects environment, is illegal, as the right to travel abroad is a fundamental right under Article 21 and the right to expression includes the right to travel abroad to express unpopular opinion.
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Francis Manjooran And Ors. vs Government Of India, Ministry Of ... on 22 September, 1965
19. Even before the Judgment of the Apex court in Menaka Gandhi's case, a Full Bench of the Kerala High Court in Francis Manjooran vs. Government of India, Ministry of External Affairs, New Delhi (A.I.R. 1966 Kerala 20) held that the right to travel abroad is a fundamental right, which flows from Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the same cannot be deprived except by procedure established by law. The relevant paragraph of the judgment reads as follows :-
Subhash Daulatra Bhojani vs State Of Gujarat on 13 March, 2015
In a recent judgment, the Gujarat High Court, in the case of Subhash Daulatra Bhojani vs. State of Gujarat, dated 13.3.2015, held that the condition imposed by the trial Court on the petitioner to surrender passport and not to undertake foreign travel, while granting bail was illegal, as it offended the right to travel abroad. Thus, even an accused, whose trial is pending, has a right to travel abroad. The relevant paragraph reads as under :-
1