Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 13 (0.86 seconds)State vs Lala on 4 February, 2010
Even in the statement u/s. 313 Cr.P.C., accused had not
taken the defence that these documents does not bear his signatures or
same have been obtained somewhere else. He had only taken the defence
that he was picked up by the police on 7.8.2004, but no evidence has
been led by the accused to prove that he was picked up on 07.08.2004.
Neither any reason has been assigned, why he was picked up by the
police official on 07.08.2004. He has not led any evidence to prove that
that he had some criminal background, prior to the incident, due to which
police has any ill motive to implicate him in this case. PW4 & PW6 have
State vs Praveen @ Kaliya & Ors FIR NO.669/04//PSÂUttam Nagar U/s. 420/489B/489C/34 IPC
27
deposited in their testimony that they have reached at the spot when
accused Parveen @ Kaliya was already apprehended by the PW3 and who
handed over him to PW6 ASI Raj Singh. Nothing has been come out in the
cross examination of PW6 ASI Raj Singh that the said person, who was
handed over by PW3 was not accused Parveen @ Kaliya, present in the
court facing trial.