Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 53 (0.54 seconds)
Glory Bai vs S.K.A.Noorjakan Beevi on 2 March, 2011 cites

Anuj Garg & Ors vs Hotel Association Of India & Ors on 6 December, 2007

Anuj Garg and others Vs. Hotel Association of India [2008 (3) SCC 1] "21. When the original Act was enacted, the concept of equality between two sexes was unknown. The makers of the Constitution intended to apply equality amongst men and women in all spheres of life. In framing Articles 14 and 15 of the Constitution, the constitutional goal in that behalf was sought to be achieved. Although the same would not mean that under no circumstance, classification, inter alia, on the ground of sex would be wholly impermissible but it is trite that when the validity of a legislation is tested on the anvil of equality clauses contained in Articles 14 and 15, the burden therefor would be on the State. While considering validity of a legislation of this nature, the Court was to take notice of the other provisions of the Constitution including those contained in Part IV-A of the Constitution.
Supreme Court of India Cites 32 - Cited by 101 - S B Sinha - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 Next