Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 13 (0.29 seconds)
Amit Jain vs Maharshi Dayanand University Rohtak & ... on 4 January, 2024 cites

Harmohinder Singh vs Kharga Canteen, Ambala Cantt on 9 July, 2001

In my considered view, the instant case is covered by the provisions of Section 2 (oo)(bb) of the said 1947 Act and keeping in view the observations of Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Escorts Limited (supra), Harmohinder Singh case (supra) and case of Municipal Council, Samrala (supra); since the termination of services of the petitioner does not amount to "retrenchment" in terms of section 2(oo)(bb) of 1947 Act, therefore, the provisions of section 25F, 25G and 25H would have no application to the case in hand.
Supreme Court of India Cites 8 - Cited by 63 - Full Document

M/S. Polyglass Acrylic Mfg..Co.Ltd vs Commissioner Of Customs, ... on 31 March, 2003

In the decision of this Court in S.M. Nilajkar v. Telecom Distt. Manager, (2003) 4 SCC 27, whereupon the learned counsel for the respondent placed strong reliance, this Court was concerned with a different fact situation obtaining therein. In that case, a scheme for absorption of the employees who were appointed for digging, laying cables, erecting poles, drawing lines and other connected works was made which came into force with effect from 1-10-1989, and only those whose names were not included for regularisation under the said scheme, raised disputes before the Assistant Labour Commissioner, Mangalore. The termination of the services of casual mazdoors by the management of Telecom District Manager, Belgaum, thus came to be questioned in the reference made by the appropriate HIMANI GUPTA 2024.01.20 12:07 Government in exercise of its power conferred upon it I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document/judgment High Court, Chandigarh CWP-11178-2016 (O&M) -12- under Section 10 of the Industrial Disputes Act. This Court, having regard to the contentions raised by the respondents that the appellant therein was engaged in a particular type of work, namely, digging, laying cables, erecting poles, drawing lines and other connected works in the project and expansion of the Telecom Office in the district of Belgaum was of the opinion: (SCC p. 37, para 13) "13. The termination of service of a workman engaged in a scheme or project may not amount to retrenchment within the meaning of sub-clause (bb) subject to the following conditions being satisfied:
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 496 - R C Lahoti - Full Document
1   2 Next