Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.27 seconds)State Of Madhya Pradesh vs Bhailal Bhai & Ors on 20 January, 1964
Reference in this regard can be made to a five-Judge
Constitution Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case
of State of Madhya Pradesh and another versus Bhailal
Bhai, AIR 1964 SC 1006 where it was held that delay in
seeking a remedy under Article 226 more than the prescribed
period of limitation would be considered unreasonable.
State Of Maharashtra vs Digambar on 12 May, 1995
In
State of Maharastra v. Digamber, 1995 (4) SCC 683, it was
held:
The Limitation Act, 1963
The Right to Information Act, 2005
1