Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 8 of 8 (0.33 seconds)
Vinaykant G Kargasthala vs State Of Gujarat & 3 on 6 February, 2017 cites

Union Of India & Ors vs M. Mathivanan on 9 June, 2006

It is evident that this judgment was not referred to the concerned Court in the case of M.D. Parmar (supra) and it is also obvious that such judgment has never been overruled or set-aside by any higher authority and therefore, it certainly remains in force till date and therefore, when there is a prior judgment on the issue confirming that similarly situated employees are entitled to benefit of G.R. dated 16.08.1994 and that too after relying upon the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. V.M. Mathivanan reported in (2006)6 SCC 57, there is no reason to deviate from such decision, which is supported by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India rather than the decision in the case of M.D. Parmar (supra) wherein neither the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India nor the case of Haribhai Shankarlal Raval (supra) was considered.
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 30 - C K Thakker - Full Document

M D Parmar Junior Clerk vs Pay And Accounts Officers & 2 on 26 February, 2014

It is evident that this judgment was not referred to the concerned Court in the case of M.D. Parmar (supra) and it is also obvious that such judgment has never been overruled or set-aside by any higher authority and therefore, it certainly remains in force till date and therefore, when there is a prior judgment on the issue confirming that similarly situated employees are entitled to benefit of G.R. dated 16.08.1994 and that too after relying upon the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. V.M. Mathivanan reported in (2006)6 SCC 57, there is no reason to deviate from such decision, which is supported by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India rather than the decision in the case of M.D. Parmar (supra) wherein neither the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India nor the case of Haribhai Shankarlal Raval (supra) was considered.
Gujarat High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - C L Soni - Full Document

State Of Gujarat & vs Haribhai Sankarlal Raval & 2 on 21 January, 2014

It is evident that this judgment was not referred to the concerned Court in the case of M.D. Parmar (supra) and it is also obvious that such judgment has never been overruled or set-aside by any higher authority and therefore, it certainly remains in force till date and therefore, when there is a prior judgment on the issue confirming that similarly situated employees are entitled to benefit of G.R. dated 16.08.1994 and that too after relying upon the judgment of Hon'ble the Supreme Court of India in case of Union of India & Ors. Vs. V.M. Mathivanan reported in (2006)6 SCC 57, there is no reason to deviate from such decision, which is supported by the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India rather than the decision in the case of M.D. Parmar (supra) wherein neither the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court of India nor the case of Haribhai Shankarlal Raval (supra) was considered.
Gujarat High Court Cites 0 - Cited by 2 - Full Document
1