Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.66 seconds)

M/S. Ballimal Naval Kishore & Anr vs Commissioner Of Income Tax on 10 January, 1997

The reliance of the AO on the decision of Hon'ble ITAT, Delhi in the case of Punj Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. which in turn has relied upon the decision of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Ballimal Navalkishore vs. CIT 224 ITR 414 on the contrary supports the case of the assessee. If as per the test laid down by the Hon'ble Court as noted in the Page 13 of the Assessment order is "the expression current repairs means - expenditure for the purpose of preserving or maintaining an already existing asset and which does not bring new asset into existence" This test is fulfilled as no new asset has come into existence but the expenses incurred are ITA No.333/Ahd/2011 Landmark Automobils Pvt Ltd For AY 2007-08 6 only for preserving or maintaining an already existing asset. Another test noted in the said decision is that "they are such repairs as are attended to as & when need arises which must be by test of commercial expediency." Here also, this test is complied with. The expenses are incurred on the basis of Dealer Development Guide set-up by Honda Company and since the assessee being in the sole business of dealing in Cars / Spares of Honda Company can legitimately think it expedient to prepare its show room, workshop in accordance with such standards The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Alembic Chemical Works Co. Ltd. V/s. CIT 177 ITR 377 held, "It would, in our opinion, be unrealistic to ignore the rapid advances in researches in antibiotic medical microbiology and to attribute a degree of endurability and permanence to the technical know-how at any particular stage in this fast changing area of medical science. The state of the Art in some of these areas of high priority research is constantly updated so that the know-how cannot be said to be the element of the requisite degree of durability and non-phemerality to share the requirements and qualifications of an enduring capital asset. The rapid strides and science and technology in the field should make us a little slow and circumspect in too readily pigeonholing an outlay, such as this as capital."
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 159 - B P Reddy - Full Document

Empire Jute Co. Ltd vs Commissioner Of Income Tax on 9 May, 1980

Landmark Automobils Pvt Ltd For AY 2007-08 7 ...... As observed by the Supreme Court in the decision in Empire Jute Co. Ltd. v. CIT [1980] 124 ITR 1 (SC) that there may be cases where expenditure, even if incurred for obtaining an advantage of enduring benefit, may, nonetheless, be on revenue account and the test of enduring benefit may break down. It is not every advantage of enduring nature acquired by an assessee that brings the case within the principles laid down in this test. What is material to consider is the nature of the advantage in a commercial sense and it is only where the advantage is in the capital field that the expenditure would be disallowable on an application of this test......".
Supreme Court of India Cites 3 - Cited by 743 - P N Bhagwati - Full Document
1