Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 5 of 5 (0.25 seconds)
Smt. J. Hemavathy vs The State Of Karnataka on 6 September, 2016 cites

Punjab National Bank & Anr vs Vilas, S/O Govindrao Bokade & Anr on 22 March, 2007

4. It is necessary to notice at this stage the parallel developments that took place. The District Caste Verification Committee which is the competent authority to verify the caste status of the candidate concerned initiated proceedings against petitioner for allegedly obtaining false caste certificate. On 11.11.2009 Caste Verification Committee passed an order canceling the certificate issued in favour of petitioner holding that the caste certificate obtained by petitioner was false. It was held that petitioner did not belong to 'Jenu Kuruba' and therefore, she was not entitled for the benefit of status of scheduled tribe. Appeal preferred against this order before the 5 appellate authority was also dismissed. That is how petitioner approached this Court in W.P.No.6383/2014 challenging both the orders. Employer -HAL was made party respondent No.3 in the said proceedings. This Court after hearing all the parties has by its order dated 18.08.2016 disposed of the writ petition by referring to various judgments of the Apex Court including the judgments in the cases of PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANOTHER VS. VILAS (2008) 14 SCC 545, SHALINI VS. NEW ENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS - (2013) 16 SCC 526, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. MILIND AND OTHERS - AIR 2001 SC 393 and ADDITIONAL GENERAL MANAGER - HUMAN RESOURCES, BHARATH HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED VS. SURESH RAMAKRISHNA BURDE - (2007) 5 SCC 336. In paragraph Nos. 15 to 17 of the said order, this Court has held as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 2 - Cited by 36 - V S Sirpurkar - Full Document

State Of Maharashtra vs Milind & Ors on 28 November, 2000

4. It is necessary to notice at this stage the parallel developments that took place. The District Caste Verification Committee which is the competent authority to verify the caste status of the candidate concerned initiated proceedings against petitioner for allegedly obtaining false caste certificate. On 11.11.2009 Caste Verification Committee passed an order canceling the certificate issued in favour of petitioner holding that the caste certificate obtained by petitioner was false. It was held that petitioner did not belong to 'Jenu Kuruba' and therefore, she was not entitled for the benefit of status of scheduled tribe. Appeal preferred against this order before the 5 appellate authority was also dismissed. That is how petitioner approached this Court in W.P.No.6383/2014 challenging both the orders. Employer -HAL was made party respondent No.3 in the said proceedings. This Court after hearing all the parties has by its order dated 18.08.2016 disposed of the writ petition by referring to various judgments of the Apex Court including the judgments in the cases of PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANOTHER VS. VILAS (2008) 14 SCC 545, SHALINI VS. NEW ENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS - (2013) 16 SCC 526, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. MILIND AND OTHERS - AIR 2001 SC 393 and ADDITIONAL GENERAL MANAGER - HUMAN RESOURCES, BHARATH HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED VS. SURESH RAMAKRISHNA BURDE - (2007) 5 SCC 336. In paragraph Nos. 15 to 17 of the said order, this Court has held as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 20 - Cited by 616 - S V Patil - Full Document

Additional General Manager/Human ... vs Suresh Ramkrishna Burde on 10 May, 2007

4. It is necessary to notice at this stage the parallel developments that took place. The District Caste Verification Committee which is the competent authority to verify the caste status of the candidate concerned initiated proceedings against petitioner for allegedly obtaining false caste certificate. On 11.11.2009 Caste Verification Committee passed an order canceling the certificate issued in favour of petitioner holding that the caste certificate obtained by petitioner was false. It was held that petitioner did not belong to 'Jenu Kuruba' and therefore, she was not entitled for the benefit of status of scheduled tribe. Appeal preferred against this order before the 5 appellate authority was also dismissed. That is how petitioner approached this Court in W.P.No.6383/2014 challenging both the orders. Employer -HAL was made party respondent No.3 in the said proceedings. This Court after hearing all the parties has by its order dated 18.08.2016 disposed of the writ petition by referring to various judgments of the Apex Court including the judgments in the cases of PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK AND ANOTHER VS. VILAS (2008) 14 SCC 545, SHALINI VS. NEW ENGLISH HIGH SCHOOL ASSOCIATION AND OTHERS - (2013) 16 SCC 526, STATE OF MAHARASHTRA VS. MILIND AND OTHERS - AIR 2001 SC 393 and ADDITIONAL GENERAL MANAGER - HUMAN RESOURCES, BHARATH HEAVY ELECTRICALS LIMITED VS. SURESH RAMAKRISHNA BURDE - (2007) 5 SCC 336. In paragraph Nos. 15 to 17 of the said order, this Court has held as under:
Supreme Court of India Cites 5 - Cited by 106 - G P Mathur - Full Document
1