Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 30 (0.82 seconds)Section 478 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957
Section 343 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 477 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 344 in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Section 345A in The Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [Entire Act]
Shri Ashok Sikka vs Dy. Commissioner (South) Mcd on 24 July, 2008
22. Mr. Jain stated that Mr. Awasthi who was one of the members
of the committee in Rajeev Malhotra (supra) was incidentally also the
counsel for the petitioner therein (i.e., appellant‟s son) in Amit Sikka
(supra) and the same is evident from the order sheets dated May 09,
2007.
Niagara Hotels & Builders (P) Ltd. vs Union Of India And Ors. on 22 November, 1996
36. It is the case of Mr. Jain that the reliance on the judgement of
M/s Niagara Hotels Builders (P) Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors, 65
(1997) DLT 826 is misplaced. According to him, this Court had held
that even if notice under Section 478 of the DMC Act has been given,
the limitation period stipulated under Section 478 would not apply to
the facts of this case and as such appellant is relying on the same to
contend that even though the appellant had given notice under Section
478 of the DMC Act, the limitation period provided therein would not
apply. Mr. Jain stated that the observations made in the judgement in
that case were made in the peculiar facts of that case, the plaintiff
therein had filed a suit for recovery for an amount which was charged
as duty on transfer of property in excess of amount payable under the
Act and there was no statutory duty involved.