Kuppana Chettiar And Anr. vs K. Ramachandran on 6 August, 1980
12.The petitioner has raised a ground that he has sent a further demand draft
representing the balance amount, however, the same was not received by the
7/11
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
CRP(MD)Nos.2103, 2116 of 2021
respondents. A Division Bench of this Court, in Kuppana Chettiar and another v.
K.Ramachandran and Nangappa Chettiar and others v. K.Subba Rao [(1981) 1
MLJ 136], has held that subsequent payment will not cure the default. The
Division Bench further held that the Revenue Court has no power to direct such
deposit, unless or otherwise the refusal was just and legal and that if the entire
arrear is not paid within the time granted, then the consequence of eviction shall
automatically follow. By referring this decision, this Court in CRP(MD)Nos.2213
to 2216 of 2013 has quashed the orders passed by the Revenue Court permitting
the petitioner to deposit the amount and has also revived the execution petition.