Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 4 of 4 (0.16 seconds)

Kuppana Chettiar And Anr. vs K. Ramachandran on 6 August, 1980

12.The petitioner has raised a ground that he has sent a further demand draft representing the balance amount, however, the same was not received by the 7/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD)Nos.2103, 2116 of 2021 respondents. A Division Bench of this Court, in Kuppana Chettiar and another v. K.Ramachandran and Nangappa Chettiar and others v. K.Subba Rao [(1981) 1 MLJ 136], has held that subsequent payment will not cure the default. The Division Bench further held that the Revenue Court has no power to direct such deposit, unless or otherwise the refusal was just and legal and that if the entire arrear is not paid within the time granted, then the consequence of eviction shall automatically follow. By referring this decision, this Court in CRP(MD)Nos.2213 to 2216 of 2013 has quashed the orders passed by the Revenue Court permitting the petitioner to deposit the amount and has also revived the execution petition.
Madras High Court Cites 13 - Cited by 9 - Full Document

N.V.E. Nachiappa Chettiar vs N.A.K. Subbier And Ors. on 15 January, 1923

12.The petitioner has raised a ground that he has sent a further demand draft representing the balance amount, however, the same was not received by the 7/11 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP(MD)Nos.2103, 2116 of 2021 respondents. A Division Bench of this Court, in Kuppana Chettiar and another v. K.Ramachandran and Nangappa Chettiar and others v. K.Subba Rao [(1981) 1 MLJ 136], has held that subsequent payment will not cure the default. The Division Bench further held that the Revenue Court has no power to direct such deposit, unless or otherwise the refusal was just and legal and that if the entire arrear is not paid within the time granted, then the consequence of eviction shall automatically follow. By referring this decision, this Court in CRP(MD)Nos.2213 to 2216 of 2013 has quashed the orders passed by the Revenue Court permitting the petitioner to deposit the amount and has also revived the execution petition.
Madras High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 18 - Full Document
1