Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 8 of 8 (0.24 seconds)The Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
S.K. Babu Syed And Anr. vs A. Zubaida Bee Represented By Her Power ... on 13 February, 1991
In the judgment reported in 1991 (1) MLJ 412 [ S.K.Babu Syed and another v. A. Zubaida Bee] this court has taken a view that a petition field under Order 41, Rule 27 of CPC is maintainable in a revision filed under section 25 of Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act 1961.
Union Of India vs Ibrahim Uddin & Anr on 17 July, 2012
Further, In the judgment reported in 2012(8) SCC 148 [ Union of India v. Ibrahim Uddin ad another] the Hon'ble Supreme Court held as follows:-
A.V.G.P. Chettiar & Sons & Ors vs T. Palanisamy Gounder on 8 May, 2002
(i) AIR 2002 SC 2171 [A.V.G.P.Chettiar and Sons and others v. T.Palanisamy Gounder] wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court held that to operate against the tenant as providing a ground for eviction under section 10 of the Act, a mere denial of the title of the landlord is not enough, such denial has to be not bona fide. Not bona fidewould mean absence of good faith or non-genuineness of the tenant's plea.
Section 10 in The Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 [Entire Act]
Rajasthan Rent Control Act, 2001
E. Venkata Naicker Trust, A Private ... vs Muthusamy Chettiar on 29 June, 1994
(ii) CDJ 1994 MHC 541 [E.Venkata Naicker Trust v. Muthusamy Chettiar] wherein this court held that there is a bona fide dispute with regard to the title to the building situated in the premises described in the petition. The dispute with regard to the title should be decided only by a Civil Court.
1