Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 14 (0.20 seconds)Section 161 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 376 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 506 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 313 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
Section 511 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Khalid & Another vs State Of U.P. on 11 May, 2016
In support he has relied on the judgment of this Court in the case of "Khalid and another Vs. State of U.P." Criminal Appeal no. 2717/2011, para no. 29 and 31. Para No. 29 and 31 is reproduced herein as under:-
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Md.Ali @ Guddu vs State Of U.P on 10 March, 2015
In fact, it has been borne out from the material on record that she had travelled from place to place and she was ravished a number of times. Under these circumstances, the medical evidence gains significance, for the examining doctor has categorically deposed that there are no injuries on the private parts. The delay in FIR, the non-examination of the witnesses, the testimony of the prosecutrix, the associated circumstances and the medical evidence, leave a mark of doubt to treat the testimony of the prosecutrix as so natural and truthful to inspire confidence. It can be stated with certitude that the evidence of the prosecutrix is not of such quality which can be placed reliance upon."
Hem Raj vs State Of Haryana on 3 January, 2014
In Hem Raj v. State of Haryana, (2014) 2 SCC 395 it has been held that :-