Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 11 (0.24 seconds)
Fakira And 12 Others vs State Of U.P. And 4 Others on 18 August, 2022 cites

Hinch Lal Tiwari vs Kamala Devi And Ors on 25 July, 2001

In the impugned order dated 23.12.2020, there is an observation that the government counsel for the State has been heard and submitted that in view of the order dated 25.7.2001 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Hinch Lal Tiwari Vs. Kamala Devi and Ors., AIR 2001 SC 3215, name of the recorded tenure holders were liable to be expunged. There is nothing in the orders dated 19.10.2016 and 23.12.2020 to demonstrate that the version of the recorded tenure holders has also been considered. There is no indication that the present petitioners were heard or afforded an opportunity of hearing before expunging their names from the revenue record.
Supreme Court of India Cites 9 - Cited by 426 - Full Document

Godawat Pan Masala Products I.P. Ltd. & ... vs Union Of India & Ors on 2 August, 2004

(7) Godawat Pan Masala Products v. Union of India, AIR 2004 SC 4057 (In this case it was held that notification prohibiting manufacture and sale etc. of pan masala and gutka was bad in law as it had been issued without providing opportunity to the manufactures of meeting the facts relied upon in the notification in respect of injurious effects of pan masala and gutka).
Supreme Court of India Cites 60 - Cited by 428 - Full Document

Director General Of Police & Ors vs Mrityunjoy Sarkar & Ors on 18 March, 1996

(5) Director General of Police v. M. Sarkar, [1996] 3 SCR 530 (In this case constables were discharged from service on the ground that they produces a fake list from Employment Exchange without providing opportunity of hearing. Supreme Court approved the order of High Court setting aside discharge order on the ground of denial of opportunity of hearing).
Supreme Court of India Cites 0 - Cited by 23 - K Ramaswamy - Full Document
1   2 Next