Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 5 of 5 (0.20 seconds)Excel Wear Etc vs Union Of India & Ors on 29 September, 1978
17. The contesting respondents seek leave of this Court for filing an appeal to the Supreme Court against the judgment just now pronounced. Since we have followed the judgment of the Supreme Court in Excel Wear v. Union of India (1978) 2 L.L.J. 527 : 1978 Lab. I.C., we do not think that the case involves a substantial question of law of general importance which needs to be decided by the Supreme Court. Hence the request for leave is rejected.
K.V. Rajendran vs Dy. Commissioner Of Labour, Madurai And ... on 20 March, 1980
After holding that Section 25-N is constitutionally invalid for the reasons given by the Supreme Court for invalidating Section 25-O, the Bench has stated that the defects pointed out by the Supreme Court in Section 25-O are present even in Sections 25-N and 25-M. Having regard to the earlier judgment of a Division Bench of this Court in K. V. Rajendran v. Deputy Commissioner of Labour (1980) 2 L.L.J. 275 : 94 L.W. 583, with which we entirely agree, we hold that Section 25-M is also constitutionally invalid for violation of Article 19(1)(f) and (g).
Section 2 in The Amending Act, 1897 [Entire Act]
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1