Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 16 (0.35 seconds)Section 34 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Arbitration Act, 1940
Section 23 in The Indian Contract Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Section 15 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
Section 28 in The Arbitration Act, 1940 [Entire Act]
Section 5 in The Arbitration And Conciliation Act, 1996 [Entire Act]
The Coinage Act, 2011
Section 19 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
Associate Builders vs Delhi Development Authority on 25 November, 2014
UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
In case of Associate Builder Vs. DDA , Honourable Apex
court has observed
Grounds on which arbitral award may be
assailed
Section 34 in conjunction with Section 5 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (1996 Act)
makes it clear that an arbitral award that is governed
by Part I of the 1996 Act can be set aside only on the
grounds mentioned under Sections 34(2) and (3), and
not otherwise. It is important to note that the 1996
Act was enacted to replace the 1940 Arbitration Act
in order to provide for an arbitral procedure which is
fair, efficient and capable of meeting the needs of
arbitration; also to provide that the Tribunal gives
reasons for an arbitral award; to ensure that the
68
Com.A.S.221/2018
Tribunal remains within the limits of its jurisdiction;