Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 18 (0.25 seconds)Section 300 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 302 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 299 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Section 34 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
The Indian Penal Code, 1860
Section 342 in The Indian Penal Code, 1860 [Entire Act]
Jai Karan And Anothers vs State Of U.P. on 15 May, 2018
14. Learned counsel for the appellant has relied upon the judgement of this Court in the case of Jai Karan and another Vs. State of U.P., 2018-4-AllLJ 529, wherein this Court has held that guilt of the accused must be proved beyond all reasonable doubts, where presence of witnesses on the scene of incident is doubtful, eye witnesses are interested and inimical and there is conflict between ocular and medical evidence, conviction cannot be sustained.
Rampal Singh vs State Of U.P on 24 July, 2012
18. In order to appreciate the argument of learned counsel for appellant no.3, relevant law requires to be considered. The Apex Court in the case of Rampal Singh Vs. State of U.P., reported in (2012) 8 SCC 289 has discussed the distinction between Section 302 and 304 IPC and also distinction between Section 304 Clause I and II IPC in paragraph nos. 15 to 25 as follows:-
Phulia Tudu And Anr vs The State Of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) on 14 September, 2007
16. The Court in Phulia Tudu (supra) provided the following comparative table to help in appreciating the points of discussion between these two offences :