Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 3 of 3 (0.22 seconds)

Technologies Pvt. Ltd.) vs Cce & St, Noida on 4 June, 2015

4. The respondent, being aggrieved by the order of appropriation and other co-noticees, being aggrieved by the adjudication order, then preferred appeals before the Tribunal [Appeal Nos. E/76154/2014 (Ishaan Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE&ST), E/76156-76160/2014 & E/76174-76175/2014 (appeals by co-noticees), E/76094/2014 to E/76099/2014 (CCE&ST, Shillong Vs. Manaksia Ltd.) and Appeal No. E/76155/2014 (Manaksia Ltd. Vs. CCE&ST, Shillong)] The said appeals were disposed of by the Tribunal by the common impugned order dated 18th December, 2019 and while the appeals of M/s. Ishaan Technologies and the co-noticees were allowed, the appeals filed by the Revenue were rejected and the order of appropriation of amount of Rs.2,37,57,760/- passed by the Commissioner against the respondent was also reversed.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 2 - Cited by 3 - Full Document

M/S Manaksia Coated Metals & vs C.C.E.-Kutch (Gandhidham) on 3 January, 2018

4. The respondent, being aggrieved by the order of appropriation and other co-noticees, being aggrieved by the adjudication order, then preferred appeals before the Tribunal [Appeal Nos. E/76154/2014 (Ishaan Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. CCE&ST), E/76156-76160/2014 & E/76174-76175/2014 (appeals by co-noticees), E/76094/2014 to E/76099/2014 (CCE&ST, Shillong Vs. Manaksia Ltd.) and Appeal No. E/76155/2014 (Manaksia Ltd. Vs. CCE&ST, Shillong)] The said appeals were disposed of by the Tribunal by the common impugned order dated 18th December, 2019 and while the appeals of M/s. Ishaan Technologies and the co-noticees were allowed, the appeals filed by the Revenue were rejected and the order of appropriation of amount of Rs.2,37,57,760/- passed by the Commissioner against the respondent was also reversed.
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 1 - Cited by 3 - Full Document
1