Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 2 of 2 (0.16 seconds)
Satish Chandra vs Northern Railway on 19 November, 2025 cites

Satish Chandra Yadav vs Union Of India on 26 September, 2022

(emphasis supplied) Page 3 of 4 CAT, Lucknow Bench O.A. No. 332/00481/2023 Satish Chandra Vs. UOI & Ors. 6.2 In the instant case it is not in dispute that the applicant was a Group 'C' employee. It is also not in dispute that the respondents, on review of the applicant's service records, revised his pay with effect from 24.09.2010 and ordered recovery vide the change memo dated 12.10.2023.
Supreme Court of India Cites 49 - Cited by 32 - Full Document

State Of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih (White Washer) on 18 December, 2014

4. The respondents state that 3rd MACP should have accrued to the applicant from 01.09.2018, i.e., 10 years after grant of 2nd MACP on 01.09.2008, but it was erroneously granted on 01.09.2008. It is contended that the mistake was rectified in light of the Railway Board's letter dated 31.08.2022 and show cause notice dated 29.08.2023 was issued to the applicant and the order dated 12.10.2023 issued thereafter. It is further contended that the applicant's status as Group 'C' employee is irrelevant as he derives satisfactory salary and no harsh recovery will be caused and, therefore, Rafiq Masih (supra) is not attracted in the applicant's case.
Supreme Court of India Cites 15 - Cited by 7379 - J S Khehar - Full Document
1