Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 21 (3.16 seconds)Section 67 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
Section 25 in The Indian Evidence Act, 1872 [Entire Act]
The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985
Section 29 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
The Indian Evidence Act, 1872
State Of Himachal Pradesh vs Shri Pirthi Chand And Anr on 30 November, 1995
We may mention that so far as the recovery panchanama is concerned it would only be relevant to the limited extent of factum of recovery. The Supreme Court in the decision State of H.P. v. Prithi Chand and another, in para 14 has observed thus: "Even if search is found to be in violation of law what weight should be given to the evidence collected is yet another question to be gone into."
The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973
Section 21 in The Narcotic Drugs And Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 [Entire Act]
T.P. Razak Alias Nagappan Razak vs State Of Kerala on 28 February, 1995
7. Mr. Lalla, learned Counsel for the appellants, invited our attention to the
decision of the Apex Court, reported in 1995(2) SCALE page 77, in the case of T.P.
Razak and another v. State of Kerala, where in paragraphs 6 and 7, the Apex Court
observed thus: