Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 46 (0.55 seconds)Anand Narayan Singh vs Union Of India & Ors on 17 May, 2010
XII. The counsels for the respondents shall provide certified copy of this judgment along with Writ C No. 13214 of 2019 (Anant Narayan Mishra Vs. The Union of India and Others) to the Registrar, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh; the Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Union of India, New Delhi and the Chairman, University Grants Commission, New Delhi, for necessary compliances.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 19 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Avinash Nagra vs Navodaya Vidyalaya Samiti Etc on 30 September, 1996
In Avinash Nagra (supra), the obligations of teachers to transform students into responsible citizens, and inculcate the value system of the Indian Constitution, was stated thus:
Mohd.Gayas @ Gayasuddin vs State Of U.P. on 13 October, 2015
200. The directions issued to the Secretary, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Union of India, New Delhi and the Chairman, University Grants Commission, New Delhi, in the leading two writ petitions, namely, Writ C No. 13214 of 2019 (Anant Narayan Mishra Vs. The Union of India and Others) and Writ C No. 26755 of 2019 (Mohammad Ghayas Vs. State of U.P. and Others), being of a general nature, shall be part of all connected writ petitions including the instant writ petition.
Mrs. Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India (Uoi) And Anr. on 25 January, 1978
87. The words 'life, law and liberty' in Article 21 of the Constitution of India, were freed from the confines of narrow and literal interpretation by the Courts. (See Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, (1978) 1 SCC 248).
Olga Tellis & Ors vs Bombay Municipal Corporation & Ors. Etc on 10 July, 1985
88. A defining moment came when the Hon'ble Supreme Court, liberated "life" from the fetters of mere physical existence. (see Olga Tellis v. Bombay Municipal Corpn. Reported at (1985) 3 SCC 545).
Prem Shankar Shukla vs Delhi Administration on 29 April, 1980
While construing the constitutional rights of prisoners, in Prem Shankar Shukla (supra), Krishna Iyer, J. speaking for a three-Judge Bench of the Hon'ble Supreme Court held:
Francis Coralie Mullin vs The Administrator, Union Territory Of ... on 13 January, 1981
92. Undermining the human dignity of a detenue, under the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities (COFEPOSA) Act, 1974 was not countenanced by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Francis Coralie Mullin v. UT of Delhi, reported at (1981) 1 SCC 608 by ruling thus: