Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 7 of 7 (0.19 seconds)Ram Rattan And Another vs State Of U.P. on 21 January, 2020
& Anr1, Ram Rattan v.
State of Uttar Pradesh2 and Munshi Ram v. Delhi
Administration3, the Supreme Court held as follows:-
Munshi Ram And Others vs Delhi Administration on 27 November, 1967
In view of the submission made by the learned Assistant
Government Pleader for Revenue and also by applying the
principle laid down in the above judgment to the present facts of
the case, without going into the merits of the case, the Writ
Petition is disposed of directing the respondent-authorities not
to interfere with the possession and enjoyment of the petitioner
over the subject land, if at all petitioner is in possession and
enjoyment of the subject land, without following due process as
contemplated under law.
Rame Gowda (D) By Lrs vs M. Varadappa Naidu (D) By Lrs. & Anr on 15 December, 2003
It is also settled law that a person in settled possession
cannot be dispossessed forcibly as held in Rame Gowda (D) By
Lrs vs M. Varadappa Naidu (D) By Lrs.
Article 14 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 21 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
Article 226 in Constitution of India [Constitution]
1