Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 11 (0.33 seconds)The Hindu Succession Act, 1956
Prakash vs Phulavati . on 16 October, 2015
From the above decision it is clear that living daughters of living
coparceners as on 9th September, 2005 are entitled for share as
coparceners in the joint family properties, subject to any
transaction of partition effected thereafter will be governed by
the Explanation. In the present case, the plaintiff's father was
Judgement
14 O.S.No.2927/2012
alive on the date of filing of the suit and joint family property is
available for partition. Therefore, plaintiff is entitled for share in
the suit property.
G M Mahendra vs G M Mohan on 22 September, 2010
2. KCCR 2011-4-2461, in the case of
G.M.Mahendra v. G.M.Mohan;
Puttakkaiah vs Basamma W/O Late Basappa on 22 September, 2012
3. 2013 (2) KCCR 1277, in the case of
Smt.Puttakkaiah v. Smt.Basamma since
dead by LRs and others;
The Registration Act, 1908
Shanthappa vs Channabasavaiah on 9 January, 2009
1. ILR 2009 KAR 1524, in the case of
Shanthappa and others vs Channabasavaiah
and others;
Sri Pitambar Kar (Dead) After Him Smt. ... vs Sri Trilochan Kar And Ors. on 6 December, 2002
4. AIR 2003 Orissa 104, in the case of Pitambar
KAR v. Trilochan KAR and others;
R Sandhya vs S.R. Raju on 13 January, 2016
5. ILR 2014 KAR 631, in the case of R.Sandhya
and another v. S.R.Raju.
G. Baramappa vs Kenchappa And Ors. on 12 March, 2003
6. AIR 2003 KAR 331, in the case of
G.Baramappa v. Kenchappa and others.